Cases 11 - 20 of 1,196
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Cruzen v. Blocker et al
as 3:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Cruzen
Defendant:
Nathan Repp, Murphy Blocker and Michelle Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spencer v. Murphy et al
as 6:2023cv03340
Plaintiff:
Donald Spencer
Defendant:
Avageleca Dayshonn Murphy, Greyhound Lines, Inc. and Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Thomas v. Murphy, et al
as 6:2023cv03341
Defendant:
Tyrone Thomas, Avageleca Dayshonn Murphy, Greyhound Lines, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Murphy v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03379
Plaintiff:
Tina Murphy
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Murphy v. Capital One, N.A.
as 4:2023cv01388
Plaintiff:
Darnell Murphy
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 0:2023cv03332
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Kevin Murphy and Steven Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 0:2023cv03336
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Kevin Murphy and Steven Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 0:2023cv03329
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Chief Kevin Murphy, Steven Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 0:2023cv03328
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Kevin Murphy and Steven Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
