Cases 41 - 50 of 1,196
Tolbert v. Simms et al
as 4:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Sherral Tolbert
Defendant:
Murphy Simms, Gregory Lalla, DR Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollis Larson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program, et al
as 23-2319
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant / Appellee:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, (MSOP), Lucinda Jesson, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities., Cal Ludeman, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities. and others
United States v. Carl Murphy
as 23-2307
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Carl Murphy, also known as P., also known as C-Note
Gibbons v. Bjorkland et al
as 0:2023cv01508
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Gibbons
Defendant:
Ethan C. Bjorkland, Melinda Erwin, John Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Goodman et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Timothy Goodman, Brandon Koenig-Messer, Ryan Loibl and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Sarah Murphy v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 23-1940
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Sarah Murphy
Defendant / Appellant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Murphy et al v. Thompson et al
as 0:2023cv01087
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Murphy and Rosemarie Murphy
Defendant:
Patricia Linda Thompson and Margaret Malotte Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bray et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00941
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bray, Robert Davies, Steven Alon Flowers Hart and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv00897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
