Cases 51 - 60 of 91
Grimm v. Raw Story Media, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00654
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Grimm
Defendant:
Raw Story Media, Inc., The Herald Publishing Company, LLC, MLive Media Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts v. Norton Shores, City of et al
as 1:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Roberts
Defendant:
Norton Shores, City of, Norton Shores Police Department, James Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01307
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua Alger, Sr. v. Muskegon County Sheriff Dept., et al
as 16-2428
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA LEVI ALGER, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MUSKEGON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, Sheriff Deputies, Medical Staff, Mental Health Staff, MARK BURNS, Lt. Sheriff Deputy, DAVID LOPEZ, Head Nurse and others
Timothy Carl v. Muskegon County, et al
as 16-2302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY A. CARL
Defendant:
MUSKEGON COUNTY, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHERINE JAWOR
Gamble v. Muskegon County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2016cv01118
Plaintiff:
Bobby Derrick Gamble
Defendant:
Muskegon County Sheriff's Department, Dean Roseler, Mark Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Muskegon, County of et al
as 1:2016cv01099
Plaintiff:
Jody Lynn Ferguson
Defendant:
Muskegon, County of, Dean Roesler, Mark Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larabee v. Muskegon, County of
as 1:2016cv00228
Plaintiff:
Deborah Larabee
Defendant:
Muskegon, County of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Callahan v. Muskegon, County of
as 1:2016cv00208
Plaintiff:
Daniel Edward Callahan
Defendant:
Muskegon, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sieradzki #193629 v. Muskegon, County of et al
as 1:2015cv01340
Plaintiff:
Richard Michael Sieradzki #193629
Defendant:
Muskegon, County of, Unknown Griswald and Jamal Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
