Cases 61 - 70 of 16,721
David Wattleton v. Nancy Berryhill
as 20-5084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant / Appellee:
Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Suzette Bourcier v. Andrew Saul, et al
as 20-35316
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUZETTE NICOLE BOURCIER
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 8:2020cv00574
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Darryl L. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin James Tunstall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv02334
Plaintiff:
Melvin James Tunstall
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cropper v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01288
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Eugene Cropper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Morris v. The United States of America (GOV) et al
as 1:2020cv02015
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, The United States of America (GOV), Nancy A. Berryhill and others
Plaintiff:
Keith S. Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sara Moore v. Andrew Saul
as 20-1260
Defendant / Appellee:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SARA MOORE
Beck v. Berryhill
as 8:2020cv00607
Plaintiff:
Jon-Peter Beck
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
John Paul Frank Schowachert v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 2:2020cv01554
Plaintiff:
John Paul Frank Schowachert
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cepeda Orlando Gilbert v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 2:2020cv01475
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Cepeda Orlando Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
