Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ag - Fed. Question - Employment Discrimination (Age)
RONDEAU et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU, BRADY TURNER, CORY GRAY and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARNAHAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv04786
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ADAM CARNAHAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spink v. Gregg County Jail
as 6:2021cv00361
Plaintiff:
Nathan Adam Spink
Defendant:
Gregg County Jail, Sarah Kirkland, Riley Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spink v. Angelina County Jail et al
as 6:2021cv00297
Plaintiff:
Nathan Adam Spink
Defendant:
Angelina County Jail, Gregg County Jail and Brandon Corbett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv09943
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv30201
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv01553
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv47695
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
