Cases 1 - 10 of 19
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12195
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL WOOD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WOODS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv02669
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL WOODS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
WOODS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24962
Plaintiff:
GOLDIE NATHANIEL WOODS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kenneth D. Bell v. Nathaniel Woods
as 22-10807
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KENNETH D. BELL
Defendant / Appellant:
NATHANIEL WOODS
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Woods v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv01416
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Woods
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WOODS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv00137
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nathaniel Woods v. Warden Holman CF, et al
as 20-10873
Petitioner / Appellant:
NATHANIEL WOODS
Respondent / Appellee:
HOLMAN CF WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Nathaniel Woods v. Commissioner, Alabama DOC, et al
as 20-10843
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, HOLMAN CF WARDEN and COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL WOODS
Woods v. Dunn et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2020cv00058
Defendant:
Steve Marshall, Jefferson S. Dunn and Cynthia Stewart
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
