Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wicomico County Branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al v. Wicomico County, Maryland
as 1:2023cv03325
Plaintiff:
Wicomico County Branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Caucus of African American Leaders, Watchmen with One Voice Ministerial Alliance and others
Defendant:
Wicomico County, Maryland, Wicomico County Board of Education, Wicomico County Board of Elections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00921
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Wrongful Termination of Employment
Caroline County Branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al v. Town of Federalsburg, Maryland
as 1:2023cv00484
Plaintiff:
Caroline County Branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Caucus of African American Leaders, Roberta Butler and others
Defendant:
Town of Federalsburg, Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Bostick & Associates Business and Legal Consulting Group, LLC v. Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, et al
as 1:2022cv02505
Defendant:
Maryland, Grace Communion International, Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences and others
Plaintiff:
Bostick & Associates Business and Legal Consulting Group, LLC, Christina J. Bostick, C.B.T. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2520 Civil Damages for Interception Wire or Oral Communications
Baltimore County Branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al v. Baltimore County, Maryland et al
as 1:2021cv03232
Plaintiff:
Baltimore County Branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, League of Women Voters of Baltimore County, Common Cause Maryland and others
Defendant:
Baltimore County, Maryland, Julian E. Jones, Jr., in his official capacity as Chairman of the Baltimore County Council, Tom Quirk, in his official capacity as Member of the Baltimore County Council and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Pension Plan, et al. v. Faucette
as 1:2021cv02967
Plaintiff:
THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE PENSION PLAN and THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE
Defendant:
SIDRA FAUCETTE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Maryland Office of the Public Defender et al v. Talbot County, Maryland
as 1:2021cv01088
Plaintiff:
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People-Talbot County Branch, Kisha Petticolas, Richard M. Potter and others
Defendant:
Talbot County, Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp
The National Federation of the Blind et al v. U.S. Department of Education et al
as 1:2018cv01568
Plaintiff:
The National Federation of the Blind , The Counsel of Parent Attorneys and Advocates, Inc. and National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Education, Betsy Devos and Candice Jackson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al v. Bureau of the Census et al
as 8:2018cv00891
Plaintiff:
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People , Prince George's County, Maryland , Prince George's County Maryland NAACP Branch and others
Defendant:
Bureau of the Census , Ron Jarmin , Wilbur Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2018cv00239
Plaintiff:
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Elaine Costanzo Duke and Kirstjen Nielsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
