Cases 41 - 50 of 1,504
Ralph Johnson, et al v. The National Collegiate Athletic Association, et al
as 22-1223
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RALPH TREY JOHNSON, CLAUDIA RUIZ, JACOB WILLEBEEK-LEMAIR and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NICHOLAS LABELLA and UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
Defendant / Appellant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, also known as the NCAA, and the Following NCAA Dvision Member Schools as Representatives of a Defendant cLASS OF All Pivate and Semi-Public NCAA Division I Member Schedules, LAFAYETTE COLLEGE, VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY and others
Defendant:
DREXEL UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNIVERSITY OF OREGON and others
Appellant:
SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE, AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES and others
Amicus Curiae:
PROFESSOR MICHAEL H. LEROY
Ralph Johnson, et al v. NCAA, et al
as 22-8003
Respondent:
RALPH TREY JOHNSON, ndividually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, CLAUDIA RUIZ, ndividually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, JACOB WILLEBEEK-LEMAIR, ndividually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated and others
Petitioner:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, a/k/a THE NCAA, AND THE FOLLOWINGNCAA DIVISION I MEMBER SCHOOLSAS REPRESENTATIVES OF ADEFENDANT CLASS OF ALL PRIVATEAND SEMI-PUBLIC NCAA DIVISION IMEMBER SCHEDULES, LAFAYETTE COLLEGE, VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY and others
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON, TULANE UNIVERSITY, PURDUE UNIVERSITY and others
Moore v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
as 1:2021cv01447
Plaintiff:
Javon Moore
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association and Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Davis et al v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
as 1:2021cv06305
Plaintiff:
Larry Davis, Randy Duncan, Brandon Robinson and others
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patelis v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
as 1:2021cv06104
Plaintiff:
James Patelis
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS et al v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2021cv02792
Plaintiff:
LARRY DAVIS, RANDY DUNCAN, BRANDON ROBINSON and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Delaney v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
as 1:2021cv05806
Plaintiff:
Jarrod O. Delaney
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and Big 12 Conference, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Erin Aldrich, et al v. NCAA, et al
as 21-3036
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIN ALDRICH, LONDA BEVINS, JESSICA JOHNSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. Families Advocating For Campus Equality, et al
as 21-1853
Plaintiff:
CHICAGO ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, ANNE DOE, JANE DOE, an individual by and through her mother and next friend Melissa White and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party:
JOHN DOE, STEVE DOE, ZACHARY DOE and others
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. Families Advocating for Campus Equality
as 21-1784
Plaintiff:
CHICAGO ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, ANNE DOE, JANE DOE, an individual by and through her mother and next friend Melissa White and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party:
JOHN DOE, STEVE DOE, ZACHARY DOE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
