Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
League of Women Voters of California et al v. Kelly et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv02665
Plaintiff: League of Women Voters of California , ACCE Institute , California Common Cause and others
Defendant: Brian P. Kelly , Jean Shiomoto and Alex Padilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
National Council of La Raza, et al v. Ross Miller, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-15077
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATIONAL COUNCIL OF LA RAZA, LAS VEGAS BRANCH OF THE NAACP, Branch 1111 and RENO-SPARKS BRANCH OF THE NAACP, Branch 1112
Defendant - Appellee: ROSS MILLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Nevada and MICHAEL WILLDEN, in his official capacity as Director of the Department of Health and Human Services of the State of Nevada
Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. National Council of La Raza Action Fund, Inc.
as 6:2012cv01889
Plaintiff: Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Defendant: National Council of La Raza Action Fund, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Type: Labor Labor: Other
National Council of La Raza et al v. Miller et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00316
Plaintiff: Las Vegas Branch of the NAACP (Branch 1111), National Council of La Raza and Reno-Sparks Branch of the NAACP (Branch 1112)
Defendant: Ross Miller and Michael Willden
Interested Party: Office of the Attorney General, State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
STATE OF FLORIDA v. UNITED STATES et al
as 4:2012mc00003
Plaintiff: STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant: UNITED STATES
Intervenor_defendant: National Council of La Raza , LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA , Kenneth Sullivan and others
Material_witne: Dennis Baxley , Miguel Diaz de la Portilla , Seth McKeel and others
United States of America v. Alabama, State of et al Featured Case
as 2:2011cv02746
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Alabama, State of , Robert J Bentley , National Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. and others
Amicu: United Mexican States , Argentina , Bolivia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STATE OF FLORIDA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01428
Plaintiff: STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Movant: KENNETH SULLIVAN , ALBERT LEO SULLIVAN , MICHAEL BERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Parsley et al v. Bentley et al
as 5:2011cv02736
Plaintiff: Henry N. Parsley, Jr. , William H. Willimon , Thomas J. Rodi and others
Defendant: Robert Bentley , Luther Strange , Robert L. Broussard and others
Amicu: United Mexican States , Argentina , Bolivia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hispanic Interest Coalition of Alabama et al v. Bentley et al Featured Case
as 5:2011cv02484
Defendant: Robert Bentley , Luther Strange , Joseph B. Morton and others
Plaintiff: Hispanic Interest Coalition of Alabama , Aids Action Coalition , Huntsville International Help Center and others
Movant: United States of America
Amicu: LULAC , META, Inc. , Hispanic College Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valle del Sol, et al, v. Whiting, et al. Featured Case
as 2:2010cv01061
Plaintiff: C.M., Jose Angel Vargas, Coalicion De Derechos Humanos and others
Defendant: Michael B Whiting, Edward G Rheinheimer, David W Rozema and others
Intervenor Defendant: Arizona, State of, Janice K Brewer, Phoenix Law Enforcement Association and others
Petitioner: First Amendment Coalition of Arizona, Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), Immigration Reform Law Institute and others
Amicus Curiae: Legal Momentum, National Council of La Raza, American Immigration Lawyers Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?