Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 339
National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford v. Secura Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv12239
Plaintiff: National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford
Defendant: Secura Insurance Company and Eco Painting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Type: Contract Insurance
North Port Retirement Center, Inc. v. National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford
as 2:2023cv00624
Plaintiff: NORTH PORT RETIREMENT CENTER, INC., a Florida corporation and North Port Retirement Center, Inc.
Defendant: NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, a foreign corporation and National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Houser v. Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company et al
as 3:2023cv01592
Defendant: Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company, American Home Assurance Company, Arrowood Indemnity Company and others
Plaintiff: Hon. Barbara J. Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Pulte Homes of New Mexico, Inc. et al v. Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd et al
as 1:2023cv00498
Plaintiff: PULTE HOMES OF NEW MEXICO, INC. and Pulte Development New Mexico, Inc.
Defendant: SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD, Cincinnati Indemnity Company, The Cincinnati Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Type: Contract Insurance
Pulte Home Company LLC v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00167
Defendant: Clarendon National Insurance Company, Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Company, United Specialty Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: Pulte Home Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Express Jewelry Enterprises, Inc v. National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford
as 2:2023cv10615
Plaintiff: Express Jewelry Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Haks Jewelry and Express Jewelry Enterprises, Inc Doing business as Haks Jewelry
Defendant: National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
BRANT LAKE CAMP, INC v. AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2023cv01105
Plaintiff: BRANT LAKE CAMP, INC
Defendant: AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING PENNSYLVANIA, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY (itself and as successor to CNA Casualty of California), NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD (itself and as successor to Transcontinental Insurance Company) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Rockingham Casualty Company v. Ruben Valtierra et al
as 3:2023cv00078
Plaintiff: Rockingham Casualty Company
Defendant: Ruben Valtierra doing business as Gonzalez Construction, Proclaim Roofing LLC, National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Lendlease (US) Construction Inc. v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company
as 22-1918
Plaintiff / Appellant: LENDLEASE (US) CONSTRUCTION INC., f/k/a Bovis Lend Lease, Incorporated, now known as Lendlease
Defendant / Appellee: NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS FOR LLOYD'S OF LONDON and others
Defendant: CNA INSURANCE GROUP, LLOYD'S OF LONDON, ATAIN INSURANCE COMPANIES, f/k/a USF Insurance Company and others
Lendlease (US) Construction Inc. v. Atain Specialty Insurance Company
as 22-1919
Plaintiff / Appellant: LENDLEASE (US) CONSTRUCTION INC., f/k/a Bovis Lend Lease, Incorporated, now known as Lendlease
Defendant / Appellee: ATAIN INSURANCE COMPANIES, f/k/a USF Insurance Company, NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS FOR LLOYD'S OF LONDON and others
Defendant: CNA INSURANCE GROUP, NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, LLOYD'S OF LONDON and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?