Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Kline v. National Gas & Electric, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Kline
Defendant:
National Gas & Electric, LLC, Todd Gibson, Keith Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Mark Metzler
Defendant:
National Gas & Electric, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Metzler v. National Gas & Electric, LLC
as 4:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Mark Metzler
Defendant:
National Gas & Electric, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Horowitz v. National Gas & Electric, LLC
as 21-2735
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Saul Horowitz, as Sellers' Representative
Defendant / Appellee:
National Gas & Electric, LLC and Spark Energy, Inc.
Reo v. National Gas & Electric LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00496
Defendant:
Baltimore Gas and Electric Company and National Gas & Electric LLC
Plaintiff:
Bryan Anthony Reo
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
McDermet v. Direct Energy, LLC
as 1:2019cv12620
Defendant:
National Gas & Electric, LLC, Renaissance Power & Gas, Inc., Mega Energy of Massachusetts, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
William McDermet
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Jennifer C. Boal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bernacchi v. National Gas & Electric, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv05414
Defendant:
National Gas & Electric, LLC and DOES 1-20
Plaintiff:
Peter Bernacchi
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
ARONSON v. NATIONAL GAS & ELECTRIC, LLC
as 2:2018cv01531
Defendant:
NATIONAL GAS & ELECTRIC, LLC
Plaintiff:
MARK B. ARONSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Ziedel v. National Gas & Electric, LLC
as 1:2018cv06792
Defendant:
National Gas & Electric, LLC
Plaintiff:
Frieda Ziedel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moore v. National Gas & Electric, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00666
Plaintiff:
George Moore
Defendant:
National Gas & Electric, LLC and John Doe Corporation
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
