Cases 1 - 10 of 11
HDR Marine, LLC v. United States Department of Commerce et al
as 3:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
HDR Marine, LLC
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1101 Violation of Maritime Regulations
Mexican Gulf v. U.S. Dept of Com
as 22-30105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mexican Gulf Fishing Company, partially owned by Billy Wells, Billy Wells, Captain, partially owns Mexican Gulf Fishing Company, A&B Charters Incorporated, owned by Allen Walburn and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Commerce, Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary, U.S. Department of Commerce, in his official capacity as Secretary of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NOAA, a scientific agency within the Department of Commerce and others
Maine Council of the Atlantic, et al v. National Marine Fisheries, et al
as 16-2155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAINE COUNCIL OF THE ATLANTIC SALMON FEDERATION, NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL OF MAINE, KENNEBEC VALLEY CHAPTER OF TROUT UNLIMITED and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries), BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE SERVICES MAINE, LLC, BROOKFIELD POWER US ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Tempest Fisheries, et al v. Locke, et al
as 11-2001
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOVGREN, NEW BEDFORD, MA, NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEMPEST FISHERIES, LTD, GRACE FISHING, INC., ROANOKE FISH CO., INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA), NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Interested Party:
BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY, DEVAL PATRICK and others
New Hampshire Commercial, et al v. Locke, et al
as 11-1987
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOVGREN, NEW BEDFORD, MA, PAUL THERIAULT and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, DAVID ARIPOTCH, RICHARD GRACHEK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA), NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Interested Party:
BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY, DEVAL PATRICK and others
City of New Bedford, et al v. Locke, et al
as 11-1952
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOVGREN, NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PAUL THERIAULT and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEW BEDFORD, MA and GLOUCESTER, MA
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE LUBCHENCO, Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA) and others
Interested Party:
BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY, DEVAL PATRICK and others
Lovgren v. Locke, et al
as 11-1964
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LOVGREN
Plaintiff:
NEW BEDFORD, MA, NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMERICAL FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PAUL THERIAULT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY F LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA), NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Interested Party:
BARNEY FRANK, JOHN F. TIERNEY, DEVAL PATRICK and others
LOVGREN v. LOCKE et al
as 1:2010cv11168
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOVGREN
Defendant:
Gary Locke , THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA) and THE NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
LOVGREN v. LOCKE et al
as 3:2010cv02162
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOVGREN
Defendant:
GARY LOCKE, THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA), THE NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
John Van Salisbury v. USA, et al
as 09-1586
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN VAN SALISBURY, Personally and trading as F/V Major Expense
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and US DEPT OF COMMERCE, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
