Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 40
National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. v. James
as 22-1374
Plaintiff / Appellant: National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc., Beretta U.S.A. Corp., Davidson's, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Letitia James, in her official capacity as New York Attorney General
Amicus Curiae: Montana, National Rifle Association of America, City of New York and others
Petitioner: Ryan Bussee
National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. et al v. James We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01348
Plaintiff: National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc., Beretta U.S.A. Corp., Davidson's, Inc. and others
Defendant: Letitia James
Amicus Curiae: Everytown for Gun Safety, Brady, New Yorkers Against Gun Violence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. USFS, et al
as 21-15907
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC. and NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant: GRAND CANYON WILDLANDS COUNCIL, SIERRA CLUB and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a United States Government Agency
State of Washington, et al v. DOS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-35391
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls, CORDELL HULL, BUREAU OF INDUSTRY AND SECURITY and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: FREDRIC'S ARMS & SMITHS, LLC and NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.
Pullman Arms, Inc., et al v. Healey
as 18-1331
Plaintiff / Appellee: NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC., PAPER CITY FIREARMS, LLC, PULLMAN ARMS, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellant: MAURA T. HEALEY, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. USFS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-15790
Plaintiff - Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, SIERRA CLUB and GRAND CANYON WILDLANDS COUNCIL
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a United States Government Agency
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL and NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.,
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. USFS, et al
as 17-15790
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. and NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.,
Plaintiff / Appellant: GRAND CANYON WILDLANDS COUNCIL, SIERRA CLUB and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a United States Government Agency
Pullman Arms, Inc., et al v. Maura Healey, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv40136
Defendant: Maura Healey, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Plaintiff: National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc., Paper City Firearms, LLC, Pullman Arms, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivan Pena, et al v. Stephen Lindley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-15449
Plaintiff - Appellant: IVAN PENA, ROY VARGAS, DONA CROSTON and others
Defendant - Appellee: STEPHEN LINDLEY, Chief of the California Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., CALIFORNIA RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION, LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE and others
Ivan Pena, et al v. Stephen Lindley
as 15-15449
Amicus Curiae: BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.,, EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROY VARGAS, DONA CROSTON, BRETT THOMAS and others
Defendant / Appellee: STEPHEN LINDLEY, Chief of the California Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?