Cases 1 - 10 of 121
Neal Technologies Incorporated v. Baxter Auto LLC
as 2:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Neal Technologies Incorporated doing business as Bullet Proof Diesel
Defendant:
Baxter Auto LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Neal v. Dulgov
as 4:2023cv00507
Petitioner:
Seneca Loyal Neal
Respondent:
A Dulgov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cunningham #360525 v. NaphCare et al
as 2:2023cv02039
Plaintiff:
Carnell Antoin Cunningham
Defendant:
NaphCare, Unknown Vargas and Unknown Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Covey v. Neal
as 2:2023cv01941
Plaintiff:
Troy Covey
Defendant:
Alicia Neal doing business as Beauty By Alicia
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Neal v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08487
Plaintiff:
Alexis D Neal
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Thornell et al
as 4:2023cv00274
Petitioner:
Marshall Neal Ray
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neal v. USAA General Indemnity Company
as 4:2022cv00509
Plaintiff:
Pamela Neal
Defendant:
USAA General Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv08162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Neal v. USA
as 2:2022cv00884
Petitioner:
Denard Darnell Neal
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Phillips v. Allen et al
as 2:2021cv01160
Plaintiff:
Shantae Marie Phillips
Defendant:
Candra Allen, Tiana Allen, Davisha Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
