Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Pamela Antosh, et al v. Village of Mount Pleasant, et al
as 23-1678
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAMELA J. ANTOSH and NED E. LASHLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PLEASANT, DAVID DE GROOT and VILLAGE OF MOUNT PLEASANT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
McNulty v. Glorioso et al
as 2:2022cv01139
Plaintiff:
Ned Charles McNulty, II
Defendant:
Ted Glorioso and Doe Security Guard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antosh et al v. Village of Mount Pleasant et al
as 2:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Pamela J Antosh, Ned E. Lashley and Ned E Lashley
Defendant:
Village of Mount Pleasant, David De Groot and Village of Mount Pleasant Community Development Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Van Eycke
as 3:2021cv00177
Plaintiff:
Ned Mitchell
Defendant:
Brian Van Eycke, Ryan White and City of Sesser, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Guerra v. Brooks et al
as 2:2020cv00748
Defendant:
Officer J Brooks, Cpt Robert Duveneck and Lt T Tikkanen
Plaintiff:
Ned Guerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Carpenter, Lipps & Leland LLP et al
as 1:2019cv08307
Defendant:
Candice L Kline, Jennifer A.L. Battle, Jill R Spiker and others
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kevin Gilyard v. John Baldwin, et al
as 18-2032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN GILYARD
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN R. BALDWIN, NED SCHWARTZ and JASON GARNETT
Gilyard v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2018cv02918
Plaintiff:
Kevin Gilyard
Defendant:
John R Baldwin , Ned Schwartz and Jason Garnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rogers v. United States et al
as 1:2016cv00425
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Rogers
Defendant:
United States , Tina Nommay, Thomas O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
