Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Ifeji v. Garland
as 24-484
Defendant:
BRETT EISELE, central pinal justice court precinct 3 judge et al., Central Pinal Justice Court Precinct 3 HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, MARIAN BROWN, dallas county sherrif et al., DALLAS COUNTY SHERRIFS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, GLENN HEGAR, texas secretary of state et al., TEXAS COMPTROLLERS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS and others
Plaintiff:
JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI, a Mooress beneficiary EMPRESS JAZLIN TRUST A Empress, Admiral, Mariner A, Merchant, Piloter Nations a private Moor aboriginal texan national territory of Spain, JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI ESTATE ET. AL., beneficiary, JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR ESTATE ET AL., beneficiary JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR et al. and others
Ifeji et al v. garland et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji, Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji Estate et al., Joseph Eddie Pryor Estate et al. and others
Defendant:
merrick garland attorney general et al., United States Department of Justice HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, andrew saul commissioner et al., Social Security Administration HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as ANDREW SAUL, janet louise yellen secretary of the treasury et al., United States Department of the Treasury HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as JANET LOUISE YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
barclay et al v. dixon et al
as 1:2023cv10272
Plaintiff:
leshawn maurice barclay
Defendant:
webb, jeremiah darnell Estate et al, barclay, noah sencer robert Estate et al, lynch, malakai levi Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kakar Kurtz v. Dr. Marie Lupica
as 23-7548
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHVETA KAKAR KURTZ, DANIEL L. KURTZ, solely in their roles as parentguardians, AMNA KAKAR KURTZ, a minor child and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MARIE LUPICA, as an individual, Treating Physician and State Actor Operating Under Color of Law and NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL, /WeillCornell Medical Center
Defendant:
DAVID HANSELL, as the Duly Appointed Commissioner of the New York City Administration for Children's Services, DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION, CITY OF NEW YORK and others
Richards v. City of New York Comptroller
as 23-956
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alroy Richards
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New York, Attn: Corporation Counsel, Police Officer Mr. John Pastoriza, 1st Precinct, NYPD and Police Officer Mr. D. Saroff, 70th Precinct
Defendant:
City of New York Comptroller, New York City Law Department, Mr. Bill De Blasio, in his offficial capacity of Mayor, City of New York and others
Jones v. The City of New York
as 23-313
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Keisha A. Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
The City of New York, New York City Department of Social Services, Westhab, Inc. and others
Defendant:
City of New York Comptroller, New York City Department of Housing, Urban Pathways, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ronnie Todd v. Ryan Todd, et al
as 22-3366
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE RAMAEL TODD
Defendant:
RYAN RAMAEL TODD, Estate, Beneficiary Ryan Ramael Todd, CHRISTINE RIDLEY, Estate, Beneficiary Christine Ridley, ROONEY TODD, Estate, Beneficiary Rooney Todd and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JEROME BLACKWELL, Estate, Beneficiary, ANTHONY BLINKEN, Secretary of State, MARK BRNOVICH, Arizona Attorney General and others
TODD v. RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE et al
as 2:2022cv04777
Plaintiff:
RONNIE RAMAEL TODD
Defendant:
RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE, Not Named Graham Estate, CHRISTINE RIDLEY ESTATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ronnie Todd v. Estate of Ronnie Ramael Todd, et al
as 22-16329
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE RAMAEL TODD, AKA Ramael Blackwell El Trust
Defendant / Appellee:
ESTATE OF RONNIE RAMAEL TODD, ESTATE OF RYAN RAMAEL TODD, RYAN RAMAEL TODD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
