Cases 51 - 60 of 134
Newell v. Velacruz et al
as 1:2017cv00022
Plaintiff:
Chiquita Newell
Defendant:
Elinor Velacruz, Laurie Longo, Linda Rosborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jones-Newell v. Wooten
as 1:2016cv10312
Plaintiff:
Victoria Jones-Newell
Defendant:
Harold L Wooten
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company et al v. J.B. Hunt Transportation, Inc.
as 1:2016cv09117
Plaintiff:
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company and Newell Rubbermaid, Inc.
Defendant:
J.B. Hunt Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kurtis M. Bailey v. Bernzomatic et al
as 1:2016cv07548
Plaintiff:
Kurtis M. Bailey
Defendant:
Bernzomatic, Worthington Cylinder Corporation , Worthington Industries Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Newell v. Cook County D.O.C
as 1:2016cv07565
Plaintiff:
Deandre Q. Newell
Defendant:
Cook County D.O.C
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2016cv00642
Plaintiff:
Nicki Newell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Klimek et al v. Worthington Cylinders Wisconsin LLC et al
as 1:2015cv09373
Plaintiff:
Dariusz Klimek and Eric Rejdak
Defendant:
Worthington Cylinders Wisconsin LLC , Worthington Cylinder Corp. , Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Cardinal Health 200 LLC v. Amosil Corp et al
as 3:2015cv00473
Plaintiff:
Cardinal Health 200 LLC
Defendant:
Amosil Corp and Joseph Newell Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newell v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv01179
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Kevin A Newell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Newell, Donald v. Rumphol, Bridget et al
as 3:2015cv00616
Plaintiff:
Donald Newell
Defendant:
Bridget Rumphol, Chippewa County, WI and State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
