Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Johnson v. Hill
as 21-20198
Defendant / Appellee:
Officer NFN Kelly, Detention Staff Member and Officer Channing Hill
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Antonio Andrea Johnson
Wolfe v. Louis et al
as 4:2019cv02356
Defendant:
L. Hudson, NFN Moninelli, NFN Perks and others
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leath v. Unnamed Defendants
as 2:2013cv00211
Plaintiff:
Patrick Leath
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendants, Oliver Bell, NFN Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Busby v. Avalon Transitional Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2012cv03868
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Busby
Defendant:
Avalon Transitional Correctional Facility, NFN Kelly, Corrol NLN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatfield v. Doe et al
as 5:2011cv00023
Plaintiff:
Timmy Edward Hatfield
Defendant:
John Doe, NFN Howe, Raytta Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Grimes et al
as 2:2007cv00191
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
Joe Grimes, NFN Rowlands, P Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singleton v. Rojas et al
as 3:2007cv03017
Plaintiff:
Michael Singleton
Defendant:
NFN Rojas, Caswell, NFN Piritis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Moore v. Rojas et al
as 3:2007cv03018
Plaintiff:
Charles Moore
Defendant:
NFN Rojas, Caswell, NFN Piritis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Williams v. Rojas et al
as 3:2007cv03019
Plaintiff:
Wilfred Williams
Defendant:
NFN Rojas, Caswell, NFN Piritis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Hanf v. Rojas et al
as 3:2007cv03014
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hanf
Defendant:
NFN Rojas, Caswell, NFN Piritis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
