Cases 1 - 10 of 166
Nichols #734845 v. Perry et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Danny Albert Nichols #734845
Defendant:
Unknown Perry, Unknown Balldini and Unknown Neeble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Davis
as 2:2024cv10543
Petitioner:
Danny Albert Nichols, Jr
Respondent:
Michigan, State of and John Davis
Nichols v. Perry et al
as 2:2024cv10542
Plaintiff:
Danny Albert Nichols, Jr
Defendant:
Perry, Balldini and Neeble
Neal v. Summit County Sheriff Kandy Fatheree et al.
as 5:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Marc Neal
Defendant:
Summit County Sheriff Kandy Fatheree, SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC., Summit Psychological Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nichols v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2024cv10345
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Nichols
Defendant:
Anne Marie McCarthy, Kim L. Worthy, David M. Parrott and others
Nichols v. Warnecke
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Randy Dean Nichols
Defendant:
John Michael Warnecke, Mathew Ellis, Adam Rummer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hamilton #941610 v. Perry et al
as 2:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Tony Hamilton #941610
Defendant:
Unknown Perry, Unknown Lakanen, Unknown Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center Prosecutor's Office et al
as 2:2023cv02762
Petitioner:
Courtney Perry
Respondent:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center Prosecutor's Office, Debbie Nichols, Bill Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nichols v. Spalding et al
as 3:2023cv00615
Plaintiff:
David Ronald Nichols
Defendant:
Samuel Todd Spalding, Rhonda Thomas and Kim May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore Nichols, Jr. v. Fredeane Artis
as 23-1990
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELMORE NICHOLS, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
FREDEANE ARTIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
