Cases filed in Maryland
Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Bradley v. CSX Transportation, Inc
as 1:2023cv03445
Plaintiff: Nicole L. Bradley and Nichole L. Bradley
Defendant: CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01953
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Nichols v. Joyce et al
as 1:2023cv01876
Plaintiff: Patrick Nichols
Defendant: Ms. Nurse Joyce, Dr. Kircher Christopher and MCCF Medical Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Warden
as 1:2023cv01657
Plaintiff: Anthony Nichols
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Newburg Service Center, Inc.
as 8:2023cv00591
Plaintiff: Philip Nichols
Defendant: Newburg Service Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nichols v. Bumgarner We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00014
Plaintiff: Patrick Nichols
Defendant: N. Bumgarner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. MCCF
as 1:2022cv02662
Plaintiff: Patrick Nichols
Defendant: MCCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brighthouse Life Insurance Company v. Nichols et al
as 1:2022cv02199
Plaintiff: Brighthouse Life Insurance Company
Defendant: Camilla Nichols, Candice Nichols, Donna Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Type: Contract Insurance
Ming v. Archbishop Spaulding High School
as 8:2022cv01624
Plaintiff: Nichole Ming
Defendant: Archbishop Spaulding High School
Frink, et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00105
Plaintiff: CAROL ANTHONY FRINK, DANNY L JORDAN, DEBRA J HOLCOMB and others
Defendant: Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?