Cases 1 - 10 of 30
ARTAVIA v. NITTA CASTINGS, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv23426
Plaintiff:
ANA PATRICIA CRUZ and ANA PATRICIA CRUZ ARTAVIA
Defendant:
CASINGS INC NITTA, SYMETRA LIFE INSURANCE, HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE and others
SAYER TECHNOLOGIES, S.L. v. VISCOFAN COLLAGEN USA INC.
as 3:2023cv02257
Counter Claimant:
VISCOFAN COLLAGEN USA INC.
Plaintiff:
SAYER TECHNOLOGIES, S.L.
Defendant:
NITTA CASTINGS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Frederick A. Nitta, M.D., Inc. v. Hawaii Medical Service Association
as 1:2022cv00371
Plaintiff:
Frederick A. Nitta, M.D., Inc., Frederick A. Nitta, Hawaii County Medical Society and others
Defendant:
Hawaii Medical Service Association, Doe Persons 1-10, Doe Partnerships 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
NITTA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv10945
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOR NITTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaysee Nitta v. USA
as 20-16362
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAYSEE NITTA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv10451
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv18639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv18588
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hawaii Medical Services Association v. Nitta, M.D.
as 1:2019cv00014
Defendant:
Frederick Nitta, M.D.
Plaintiff:
Hawaii Medical Services Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
