Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dye v. Plaster et al
as 7:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jesse Ryan Dye
Defendant:
Christopher Plaster, Katie Gallagher, Richard Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZBZ & Associates, Inc. v. Noah Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 2:2019cv00655
Defendant:
Noah Enterprises, Inc. and Westfield Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
ZBZ & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3133
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Juul Labs, Inc. v. The Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A
as 1:2019cv00715
Defendant:
The Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A, Peng Lin, Kevin Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Juul Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Tapia v. Rao et al
as 3:2018cv00899
Defendant:
Shawn Brixey, Noah Simblist and Michael Rao
Plaintiff:
Javier Tapia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Weinschel v. Fritzinger
as 2:2018cv00119
Plaintiff:
Alexander Noah Weinschel
Defendant:
Mr. Fritzinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. USA
as 4:2016cv00064
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Noah Christopher Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the use and benefit of MALLORY ELECTRIC COMPANY v. NOAH MEB JV3 et al
as 4:2015cv00102
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the use and benefit of MALLORY ELECTRIC COMPANY
Defendant:
NOAH MEB JV3 and WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3133
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
