Cases 1 - 10 of 14
GREEN et al v. WESTERN EXPRESS, INC et al
as 3:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Norman Green and Rhea Green
Defendant:
Western Express Inc and Terry Lee Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GREEN et al v. WESTERN EXPRESS, INC et al
as 5:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
NORMAN GREEN and RHEA GREEN
Defendant:
WESTERN EXPRESS, INC and TERRY LEE SNYDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GREEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv51035
Plaintiff:
NORMAN GREEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gold Standard Baking, Inc., et al v. James Zollicoffer, et al
as 20-8012
Respondent:
ANTWOIN HUNT, JAMES ZOLLICOFFER and NORMAN GREEN
Petitioner:
PERSONNEL STAFFING GROUP, LLC, doing business as MOST VALUABLE PERSONNEL and GOLD STANDARD BAKING, INC.
Anderson v. Green et al
as 3:2020cv00027
Defendant:
Doe Defendant 3, Doe Defendants 6-10, Doe Defendant 4 and others
Plaintiff:
Erica Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Accardo et al v. Kingdon of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11314
Plaintiff:
Douglas E. Smith, Zulma Candelario, Norman Green and others
Defendant:
Kingdon of Saudi Arabia
Petitioner:
Darryl Adone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Antiterrorism & Effective Death Penalty Act 1996
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv11086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Green v. Can-Am et al
as 1:2012mc00003
Petitioner:
Norman Green
Respondent:
Can-Am, Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc., BRP, Inc. and others
Norman Green, et al. v. Metropolitan Life In, et al.
as PAE/2:10-CV-65871
Plaintiff:
Norman Green
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life In
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-3245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
