Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Pegues, Norris v. Hoffman, Karl et al
as 3:2022cv00352
Plaintiff:
Norris Pegues
Defendant:
Karl Hoffman, Ms. Warner, Holly Gunderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huiras v. Cafferty et al
as 2:2022cv00575
Plaintiff:
Nathan John Huiras
Defendant:
Kristen Cafferty, Megan McGee Harris, Jessica Anne Groundberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
It v. Norris Adolescent Center et al
as 2:2020cv01504
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Does, Norris Adolescent Center and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony K It
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Great Lakes Alfalfa, LLC v. Warren & Baerg Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00574
Plaintiff:
Great Lakes Alfalfa, LLC
Defendant:
Warren & Baerg Manufacturing, Inc. and Norris Thermal Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norris, Daryl v. Mahoney, David et al
as 3:2016cv00212
Petitioner:
Daryl O. Norris
Respondent:
David Mahoney and Attorney General of the State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris, Daryl v. Wolfe, Britany et al
as 3:2015cv00177
Plaintiff:
Daryl O. Norris
Defendant:
Britany Wolfe , Bill Lazar , Lance Wiersna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks et al v. Barkhaus et al
as 2:2012cv00785
Defendant:
Paul E Barkhaus and ABC Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Norris JM Banks and Hope E Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pegues v. Clarke et al
as 2:2012cv00017
Plaintiff:
Norris E Pegues
Defendant:
David A Clarke, Jr, Francis C Springob, James Bruno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pegues, Norris v. Huibregtse, Peter
as 3:2011cv00194
Petitioner:
Norris E. Pegues
Respondent:
Peter Huibregtse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Powell v. Raemisch
as 3:2009cv00306
Plaintiff:
Norris Termaine Powell, Sr.
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
