Cases 21 - 30 of 493
Ray Heid, et al v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 23-3367
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAY SCOTT HEID and JAMES E. DAMRON
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY C. MOHR, Director, ROGER WILSON, Chief Inspector, TREVOR CLARK, Individually and others
Bektas v. Lorain County Job and Family Service et al
as 1:2023cv00846
Plaintiff:
Haydar Bektas
Defendant:
Lorain County Job and Family Service, Ohio Department of Job and Family Services Bureau of State Hearings, Jennifer Roseback and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Norris v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02215
Petitioner:
Teddy Norris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Taylor v. Speedway, LLC
as 5:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
Norris Taylor
Defendant:
Speedway, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Norris et al v. Swertzfigure et al
as 1:2023cv00670
Plaintiff:
Steven Norris, K. N., L. N. and others
Defendant:
Drew Swertzfigure and Cuyahoga Children Family Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Norris v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02179
Petitioner:
Teddy Norris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hudson v. Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv02060
Not Classified By Court:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Norris Hudson
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Wills v. Eaton et al
as 3:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
James A. Wills
Defendant:
Timothy Eaton, K. Monzon, Matthew Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonio Hudson v. Arthur Tarnow, et al
as 23-1016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO HUDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
HONORABLE ARTHUR J TARNOW, HONORABLE BERNARD FREIDMAN, HONORABLE PAUL J. KOMIVES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
