Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Lester v. Norwood et al
as 1:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Michael Fred Allen Lester
Defendant:
Sheriff David Norwood, Jail Administrator Cameron Owens, Shift Supervisor Amanda Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00823
Plaintiff:
Jake Lynn Norwood
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Kenny Bolden, RD Williamson Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBroom v. Boyd et al
as 3:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Sahelian Deondrae McBroom
Defendant:
Marty Boyd, Calderone, Stanfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Norwood
as 1:2022cv01037
Plaintiff:
Johnathon S. Hicks and Bryce's Bail Bonds, Inc.
Defendant:
David Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Norwood v. Yates
as 2:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lynn Norwood
Defendant:
John Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Norwood v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 4:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
Marilyn McCoy Norwood
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Secret Service, Little Rock Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Hastings v. Rarwood et al
as 3:2021cv00169
Plaintiff:
Steven Hastings
Defendant:
David Norwood, Cameron Owens, Roy Agee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Payne et al
as 2:2021cv00077
Plaintiff:
Travis Ray Wilson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William F Straughn, Gaylon Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilmoth v. Payne et al
as 2:2021cv00076
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Wilmoth and T Washington
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William F Straughn, Gaylon Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrows v. Payne et al
as 2:2021cv00092
Plaintiff:
DeQuion Burrows
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William F Straughn, Gaylon Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
