Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv02366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Nacho Hernandez et al
as 5:2025cv01978
Defendant:
Nacho Hernandez, Jose Ignacio Hernandez and Maria Guadalupe Hernandez
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv05514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv20704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2sh Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
United States of America v. Garay (Escobar Orejuela)
as 24-2177
Defendant:
JORGE IGNACIO FIGUEROA, JOSE M. ESCOBAR, JR., GUILLERMO GARAY and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nacho Daddy LLC v. Edwards
as 4:2023cv01185
Plaintiff:
Nacho Daddy LLC
Defendant:
Chris Edwards doing business as Nacho Daddy's BBQ
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Hansard et al v. Zamora et al
as 4:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
George Hansard and Stacy Hansard
Defendant:
Gabriel Zamora, Billy Espino, Freddie Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris et al v. Nacho Daddy, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02722
Plaintiff:
Jashea Harris and Eugene Cardoza
Defendant:
Nacho Daddy, LLC, ABC Company and John Does (1-5)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
