Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Nacho Mazzini Family LLC v. Intuit Inc.
as 1:2026cv26056
Plaintiff:
Nacho Mazzini Family LLC
Defendant:
Intuit Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
IN RE SIRKEL 360 S.L.
as 1:2026mc26042
Petitioner:
SIRKEL 360 S.L.
Respondent:
Malinche Productions, LLC,, Malinche Productions MX, LLC, a and Ignacio "Nacho" Cano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Hansard v. Zamora
as 26-50694
Plaintiff:
George Hansard and Stacy Hansard
Defendant:
Gabriel Zamora, sued in his individual capacity only, Billy Espino, sued in his individual capacity only, Freddie Martinez, sued in his individual capacity only and others
Ho v. Fraizer et al
as 1:2026cv04855
Defendant:
Schnahider Demostenas, Santiago, A. Fraizer and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew B. Ho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv02366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Nacho Hernandez et al
as 5:2025cv01978
Defendant:
Nacho Hernandez, Jose Ignacio Hernandez and Maria Guadalupe Hernandez
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv05514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv20704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2sh Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
