Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Enabnit v. Nanos
as 4:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
John Eugene Enabnit
Defendant:
Chris Nanos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Nanos et al
as 4:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Warren
Defendant:
Chris Nanos, Laura Conover, Samantha Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Lawson v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Lawson
Defendant:
Pima, County of, Pima County Sheriff's Department, Chris Nanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foley v. Koumal et al
as 4:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
Matthew V Foley, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Koumal, Scott Lowing, Linda Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luster v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2022cv00519
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lee Luster
Defendant:
Pima, County of, Chris Nanos, Unknown Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foley v. Nanos et al
as 4:2022cv00513
Plaintiff:
Matthew V Foley, Jr.
Defendant:
Chris Nanos, Paula Perrea, Linda Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Inzunza v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2022cv00512
Plaintiff:
Mariah Inzunza
Defendant:
Pima, County of, Chris Nanos, NaphCare Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marx v. Nanos et al
as 4:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Marx
Defendant:
Christopher Nanos, NaphCare, Pima County Jail Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sermah-Guerrero v. Pima County Adult Detention Center et al
as 4:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Jamil Sermah-Guerrero
Defendant:
Pima County Adult Detention Center, Chris Nanos and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
