Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Dull v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
Nathan G. Dull
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dull v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv01406
Plaintiff:
Nathan G. Dull
Defendant:
Jaimee Williams, Christy Scott and Cupe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dull v. Commissioner of Correction
as 3:2023cv01220
Petitioner:
Nathan G Dull and Nathan G. Dull
Respondent:
Commissioner of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dull v. Commissioner of Correction
as 3:2023cv01195
Petitioner:
Nathan G Dull and Nathan G. Dull
Respondent:
Commissioner of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dull v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00736
Petitioner:
Nathan Gene Dull
Respondent:
Cheshire Correctional Institute and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kresge et al v. Greenberg
as 3:2022cv00700
Plaintiff:
David Kresge and Snaplok Systems LLC
Defendant:
Nathan Greenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Laput v. Brennan et al
as 3:2022cv00394
Plaintiff:
Nathan Michael Laput
Defendant:
Janine Brennan, Allison Hill, Ingred Feder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kresge et al v. Greenberg
as 3:2021cv01707
Plaintiff:
David Kresge and Snaplok Systems LLC
Defendant:
Nathan Greenberg
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Greene v. Waterbury Police Dept et al
as 3:2021cv01513
Plaintiff:
Edward Greene
Defendant:
Waterbury Police Dept, James McMahon, Paul Charette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
