Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 31 - 40 of 255
CLAYTON v. ALLEN et al
as 7:2019cv00006
Plaintiff: EARNEST CLAYTON
Defendant: MARTY ALLEN, KEARINS, HYANNA BRUCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox et al v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2018cv05600
Plaintiff: Cecil Cox and John Gross
Defendant: Governor Nathan Deal, The State of Georgia and Sheriff Theodore Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Deal
as 1:2018cv05549
Plaintiff: Matthew Washington
Defendant: Governor Nathan Deal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Deal et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv05243
Defendant: Georgia Department of Corrections, Cobb County Superior Court, Christopher Michael Carr and others
Plaintiff: Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Roberts et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00197
Defendant: Mrs. Lisa Mayo, Mrs. Rita K. Lomio, Mr. Stan Baker and others
Plaintiff: Robert Lee Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. DEAL
as 1:2018cv00181
Petitioner: OTIS THOMAS
Respondent: GOVERNOR NATHAN DEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gresham v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2018cv04342
Defendant: Vernon S. Pitts, Jr., Dennis Francis, John Nathan Deal and others
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Gresham
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2018cv00090
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
City of Stockbridge, Georgia et al v. Tina Lunsford et al
as 1:2018cv03961
Plaintiff: Elton Alexander, John Blount, Urban Redevelopment Agency of the City of Stockbridge and others
Defendant: Tina Lunsford, Secretary of State Brian Kemp, Nathan Deal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cormican v. Deal et al
as 1:2018cv03772
Plaintiff: James Elias Cormican, Jr.
Defendant: State of Georgia and Governor Nathan Deal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?