Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv04973
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
United States of America v. Rimpler et al
as 3:2011cv00508
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Debra A Rimpler, Norwest Mortgage Inc , National Credit Acceptance Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv10657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2010cv60083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rahaman v. Nathan A. Schwartz, P.A. et al
as 1:2009cv22471
Plaintiff:
Faizool Rahaman and Faizool Rahaman
Defendant:
Nathan A. Schwartz, P.A. and National Credit Acceptance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rickley v. NCA Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00296
Plaintiff:
Enid G. Rickley
Defendant:
NCA Financial Services, Inc. and National Credit Acceptance
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fourscore Resource Capital, LLC v. National Credit Acceptance, Inc. et al
as 2:2009at00022
Plaintiff:
Fourscore Resource Capital, LLC
Defendant:
National Credit Acceptance, Inc. and Michael Sahlbach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Fourscore Resource Capital, LLC v. National Credit Acceptance, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00032
Plaintiff:
Fourscore Resource Capital, LLC
Defendant:
National Credit Acceptance, Inc. and Michael T. Sahlbach
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv03922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
