Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Hilton v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 6:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Robert Hilton
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Amtrak Railroad and Amtrak Rail Road Conductor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1912
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Richardson-Walker v. National Railroad Passenger Corporaton
as 1:2021cv02764
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Richardson-Walker
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111
Acuna v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv00175
Plaintiff:
Lisseth Acuna
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation , Oliver I. Askew, Brandt Bartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Alvia Lacy v. National Railroad Passenger Co
as 15-1013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALVIA L. LACY
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, Amtrak and LARRY TAYLOR
Lacy v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00179
Plaintiff:
Alvia L. Lacy
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Larry Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMillan v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv00189
Plaintiff:
Mertis B. McMillan
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Donald Prince
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv02447
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
