Cases 91 - 100 of 148
Gilani v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d/b/a AMTRAK
as 8:2015cv02088
Plaintiff:
Diane Gilani
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d/b/a AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Witham et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
as 1:2015cv02092
Plaintiff:
Gibbuda Witham and Mansi Mehta Witham
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kim et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
as 1:2015cv01925
Plaintiff:
Jae-Yeon Kim and Sangyoon Nathan Park
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 7:2015cv02568
Plaintiff:
Ida Young
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alt v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2015cv01529
Plaintiff:
Sharon Mae Alt
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2015cv00502
Plaintiff:
Barbara Miller
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alvia Lacy v. National Railroad Passenger Co
as 15-1013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALVIA L. LACY
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, Amtrak and LARRY TAYLOR
Miller v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 8:2014cv03526
Plaintiff:
Rahsaan S. Miller
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
O'Quinn v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 3:2014cv00736
Plaintiff:
Heather R. O'Quinn
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Heckler v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 8:2014cv03350
Plaintiff:
Joseph Heckler
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
