Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Mondelli v. Walmart Stores, Inc et al
as 7:2020cv03564
Plaintiff:
Bridget Mondelli
Defendant:
National Realty & Development Corp., Wal-Mart Stores East, LP i/s/h/a "Walmart Stores, Inc. a/k/a Walmart Corp.", Middletown I Resources LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
Conrad v. Best Buy Stores Limited Partnership et al
as 3:2020cv00470
Plaintiff:
Cherie Conrad
Defendant:
National Realty & Development Corp., National Development Resources Limited Partnership and Best Buy Stores Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gutic v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv09552
Defendant:
MIDDLETOWN I RESOURCES, LP i/s/h/a NATIONAL REALTY & DEVELOPMENT CORP. a/k/a NRDC, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP i/s/h/a WALMART, INC., National Realty & Development Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Zineta Gutic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr
CICCOTELLI v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 3:2016cv05829
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. , JOHN DOES 1-5 and NATIONAL REALTY & DEVELOPMENT CORP.
Cross_claimant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cross_defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STOKES v. LORD & TAYLOR STORES USA, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv00102
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY STOKES
Defendant:
LORD & TAYLOR STORES USA, INC. and NATIONAL REALTY & DEVELOPMENT CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv03213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
James Roudabush v. National Realty & Development, et al
as 12-3855
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL REALTY & DEVELOPMENT CORP EQUITY PARTNERS, LORD & TAYLOR and CHUCK TAYLOR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv05471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
