Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Afshin Bahrampour v. National Security Agency
as 24-1202
Plaintiff:
AFSHIN BAHRAMPOUR
Defendant:
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ronald Emrit v. National Security Agency
as 22-1355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
Ronald Emrit v. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
as 22-1334
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, (CIA), DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, (DNI) and NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL, (NSC)
Ronald Emrit v. CIA
as 22-1337
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, CIA, DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, DNI and NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL, NSC
Emrit v. National Security Agency (NSA)
as 1:2022cv00639
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
National Security Agency (NSA)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Emrit v. National Security Agency
as 1:2022cv00640
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
National Security Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
James Adeyemi v. Office of General Counsel for Booth Officer NSA
as 22-1278
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ADEYEMI
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL FOR BOOTH POLICE OFFICERS, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
Emrit v. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) et al
as 3:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Director of National Intelligence and National Security Council
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emrit v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 2:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Director of National Intelligence and National Security Council
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
