Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
IJAZ v. SINGH et al
as 2:2024cv07687
Defendant: NAVJOT SINGH, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10(fictitious names, true names unknown), JOHN DOES 1-10(FICTITIOUS NAMES, TRUE NAMES UNKNOWN) and others
Plaintiff: MUHAMMAD IJAZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
IJAZ v. SINGH et al
as 1:2024cv07687
Plaintiff: MUHAMMAD IJAZ
Defendant: NAVJOT SINGH, UNITEK LOGISTICS, INC., ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10(fictitious names, true names unknown) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Navjot Singh v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-3015
Petitioner: NAVJOT SINGH
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rodriguez v. HBC Transportation, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00286
Plaintiff: Javier Manrique Rodriguez
Defendant: HBC Transportation, Inc. and Navjot Singh Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Type: Contract Insurance
Navjot Singh v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-1549
Petitioner: NAVJOT SINGH
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Singh v. Garland
as 21-6212
Petitioner: NAVJOT SINGH
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Singh v. Garland
as 22-6032
Petitioner: NAVJOT SINGH
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Singh v. Attorney General of the State of Califonria We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv03351
Petitioner: Navjot Singh
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Califonria
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Navjot Singh v. Attorney General United States We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-2100
Petitioner: NAVJOT SINGH
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Paredes v. Tristar Carriers Ltd, et al
as 5:2020cv00111
Plaintiff: Pedro Paredes
Defendant: Bodkin Leasing, Navjot Singh and Tristar Carriers Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?