Cases 1 - 10 of 1,239
Kingston v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2024cv01332
Plaintiff:
Neil Kingston
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Danyell Walker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Parrish, Christopher Neil v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv14085
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neil Parrish
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banner, Antonio L. v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv14080
Plaintiff:
Antonio Leon Banner
Defendant:
Tim Jones, Neil Lettman and Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
American Gold Label Foods, Inc., et al v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv60420
Plaintiff:
American Gold Label Foods, Inc., a Florida Corporation and Neil W. Rodin
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Wainwright v. Dodge
as 0:2024cv60401
Plaintiff:
Edward Wainwright
Defendant:
Neil Dodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
In re: Jerry Alfred
as 24-10652
Petitioner:
In re: JERRY NEIL ALFRED
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF FLORIDA
Gillespie v. Google LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Neil J. Gillespie
Defendant:
Google LLC, Alphabet Inc., Verizon Communications, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Neil WalkerIn re: Neil Walker
as 24-10597
Petitioner:
In re: NEIL WALKER
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
