Cases 1 - 10 of 1,124
Ogden v. Turner, et al
as 24-2079
Petitioner:
KEVIN K. OGDEN
Respondent:
NEIL TURNER, Warden, GUADALUPE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Parrish, Christopher Neil v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv14085
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neil Parrish
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberson v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00241
Petitioner:
Neil James Roberson
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ronald Dale Bennett v. Neil McDowell
as 5:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Ronald Dale Bennett
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilberto L. Gonzalez v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2023cv10657
Petitioner:
Gilberto L. Gonzalez
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilbert L. Gonzalez v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2023cv10564
Petitioner:
Gilberto L. Gonzalez
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parrish v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv14401
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neil Parrish
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saylor v. Cargor
as 2:2023cv13072
Petitioner:
Brian Neil Saylor
Respondent:
Warden Cargor, Cargor and Kim Cargor
Marcus Aubry v. Neil McDowell
as 5:2023cv02400
Petitioner:
Marcus Aubry
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neil v. Farmington Correctional Center
as 1:2023cv00191
Petitioner:
Wendell H. Neil
Respondent:
Farmington Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
