Cases 21 - 30 of 534
USA v. Maxwell
as 23-10795
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Gregory Neil Maxwell
Maxwell v. USA
as 2:2023cv00090
Petitioner:
Gregory Neil Maxwell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Marble v. Forrest General Hospital et al
as 2:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Salinas Marble
Defendant:
Forrest General Hospital, Dr. John Doe, Nurse Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
El Neil v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00473
Plaintiff:
Siham Ibrahim Mohamed El Neil
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
VANDERPOOL MANAGEMENT, LP v. SLOAN et al
as 5:2023cv00461
Plaintiff:
VANDERPOOL MANAGEMENT, LP
Defendant:
DON SLOAN, BOB WILLIAMS, NEIL BOULTINGHOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sparks v. Wilson
as 23-10327
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jayson Neil Sparks
Defendant / Appellee:
Sharen Wilson, State Bar of Texas and BODA/Texas Supreme Court
Fields v. Martin et al
as 4:2023cv01133
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Fields
Defendant:
Amy Martin, Neil Davis, III, Chanice Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kosier et al v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
as 6:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Chalice Kosier and Jason Neil Kosier
Defendant:
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Breach of Contract
Maxwell v. USA
as 2:2023cv00024
Petitioner:
Gregory Neil Maxwell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
