Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Tate (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Neil Andrew Robinson
Defendant:
William A. Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv00460
Plaintiff:
Timothy Neil McCoy and Ofie McCoy
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Bell v. Valenza et al
as 1:2020cv00131
Defendant:
James Brazier, Houston County, Alabama, Houston County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Christena Denis Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Golden State Foods Corporation v. GEA Systems North America, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01020
Defendant:
GEA Systems North America, LLC, Neils Erik Olsen, John Ansbro and others
Plaintiff:
Golden State Foods Corportation and Golden State Foods Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Darbouze (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00591
Plaintiff:
Neil Walker
Defendant:
Jean Darbouze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorn v. Waffle House, Inc., et al
as 2:2017cv00220
Plaintiff:
Aaron L. Thorn
Defendant:
Waffle House, Inc. , Marquetta Johnson and Neil Greenwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Aramstrong et al(MAG+)
as 2:2016cv00596
Plaintiff:
Bruce Williams
Defendant:
Neil Aramstrong and Richard Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Myers et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2016cv00202
Plaintiff:
Neil Walker
Defendant:
Walter Myers, Luther Strange and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
