Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Jasmol Singh et al v. Heja Rosebiani et al
as 2:2023cv05115
Plaintiff:
Jasmol Singh and Umit Bagga
Defendant:
DEA Special Agent Heja Rosebiani, DEA Special Agent Mark Carroll, CHP Officer Jay Sides and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson Romero v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 19-40729
Petitioner / Appellant:
NELSON ROMERO
Respondent / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Nelson Romero v. SB Police Department et al
as 5:2019cv00715
Plaintiff:
Nelson Romero
Defendant:
SB Code Enforcement, SB Police Department and David Cohn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CBD Hemp Corporation et al v. Saleh Sarwar et al
as 5:2019cv00315
Plaintiff:
CBD Hemp Corporation and Nelson Romero
Defendant:
Sal, Saleh Sarwar and Positive Roots
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flor M. Funes et al v. Tiffany Hsieh et al
as 5:2017cv02279
Plaintiff:
Flor M. Funes and Nelson Romero
Defendant:
Tiffany Hsieh and Yvonne Hui
Nelson Romero v. Jim McDonnell et al
as 5:2017cv01830
Defendant:
City of Lynwood, Dan Holguin, Sheriff Jim McDonnell and others
Plaintiff:
Nelson Romero
Romero v. Great Mobility, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv22743
Plaintiff:
Nelson Romero
Defendant:
Great Mobility, Inc. and Irene Brito
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Nelson Romero v. Johnny Sausceda, et al
as 14-11351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NELSON ROMERO, also known as Richard Romero
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNNY SAUSCEDA, Jail Administrator of Dawson County Jail, SERGEANT BAGBY and DAVIS
Romero v. Sausceda et al
as 2:2014cv00228
Plaintiff:
Nelson Romero
Defendant:
Johnny Sausceda, NFN Bagby and NFN Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson Romero v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-40570
Petitioner - Appellant:
NELSON ROMERO
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
