Cases 11 - 20 of 129
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Incorporated Village of Muttontown et al
as 2:2022cv05524
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
The Incorporated Village of Muttontown, The Incorporated Village of Muttontown Board of Trustees, The Planning Board of the Incorporated Village of Muttontown and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Lauren Calabrese, Aldo Calabrese, Tara Rice and others
Intervenor:
Russell McRory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
City of Jefferson, Missouri v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 4:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
City of Jefferson, Missouri
Defendant:
AT&T Corp., AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, f/k/a Cingular Wireless, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC v. City of West Covina, California
as 2:2022cv01642
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC
Defendant:
City of West Covina, California
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Richard Copeland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Hartford
as 3:2021cv01609
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
City of Hartford
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Town of Heath et al
as 3:2021cv30106
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
Town of Heath, Town of Heath Planning Board, Doug Mason and others
Intervenor:
Edward Whitaker, Tara Mason, Kate Peppard and others
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC v. City of Southgate, California
as 2:2021cv07631
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC doing business as AT and T Mobility
Defendant:
City of South Gate, California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. City of St. Joseph, Missouri et al
as 5:2021cv06114
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
City of St. Joseph, Missouri and City Council of the City of St. Joseph, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC et al v. NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS et al
as 2:2021cv12302
Defendant:
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS and THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, NEW JERSEY
Plaintiff:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC D/B/A AT&T MOBILITY and T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251
NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al v. THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2021cv12306
Plaintiff:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC D/B/A AT&T MOBILITY, T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC, NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS and others
Defendant:
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, NEW JERSEY and THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251 Telecommunications Act of 1996 - Interconnection
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Oyster Bay et al
as 2:2021cv03201
Defendant:
Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Oyster Bay, Planning and Development Department of the Town of Oyster Bay, Town of Oyster Bay, New York and others
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
