Cases 21 - 30 of 155
NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al v. THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2021cv12306
Plaintiff:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC D/B/A AT&T MOBILITY, T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC, NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS and others
Defendant:
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, NEW JERSEY and THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251 Telecommunications Act of 1996 - Interconnection
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Oyster Bay et al
as 2:2021cv03201
Defendant:
Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Oyster Bay, Planning and Development Department of the Town of Oyster Bay, Town of Oyster Bay, New York and others
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC v. City and County of San Francisco
as 4:2021cv02871
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. County of Ventura, California
as 2:2021cv03079
Defendant:
County of Ventura and County of Ventura, California
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireles PCS LLC and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Violation of Telephone Consumer Protection Act
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2021cv00443
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T MOBILITY
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
Crown Castle Towers 06-2 LLC et al v. The Town of Riverhead et al
as 2:2021cv00789
Defendant:
Town of Riverhead Town Board, Town of Riverhead Zoning Board of Appeals, Town of Riverhead Planning Board and others
Plaintiff:
Sprint Spectrum L.P., Global Signal Acquisitions III LLC, STC-Five LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Planning Board of the Town of Corinth et al
as 1:2021cv00149
Defendant:
The Town of Corinth, The Town of Corinth Building Department and The Planning Board of the Town of Corinth
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Not Classified By Court:
Thomas J. Fucillo
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332 Telecommunications Act of 1996.
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Village of Palmrya
as 4:2021cv03032
Defendant:
Village of Palmrya
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0251
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC, v. County of Santa Barbara, California
as 2:2020cv11804
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC, d/b/a AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
County of Santa Barbara, California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC v. Monroe County Board of Commissioners et al
as 3:2020cv01327
Defendant:
Monroe County Board of Zoning Appeals and Monroe County Board of Commissioners
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
