Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Hudson Shore Associates Limited Partnership et al v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Hudson Shore Associates Limited Partnership, Haven on the Hudson LLC, Kenneth Levinson and others
Defendant:
The State of New York, The New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, The Village of Nyack, New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Torres v. MMS Group LLC et al
as 1:2022cv06142
Plaintiff:
elewood torres
Defendant:
MMS Group, LLC, Housing Development Fund Corporation, TUC Management Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
G-Max Management, Inc. v. State of New York
as 21-2448
Plaintiff:
66 East 190 LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
G-Max Management, Inc., 1139 Longfellow, LLC, Green Valley Realty, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
State of New York, Letitia James, In her offical capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York, RuthAnne Visnauskas, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal and others
Defendant:
County of Westchester and City of Yonkers
Intervenor:
N.Y. Tenants and Neighbors (T&N) and Community Voices Heard (CVH)
74 Pinehurst LLC. v. State of New York
as 21-558
Defendant / Appellee:
J. Scott Walsh, In his official capacity as a Member of the Rent Guidelines Board, Alex Schwartz, In his official capacity as a Member of the Rent Guidelines Board, Patti Stone, In her official capacity as a Member of the Rent Guidelines Board and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eighty Mulberry Realty Corporation, Dimos Panagoulias, 177 Wadsworth LLC and others
Amicus Curiae:
Cato Institute and National Association of REALTORS
Petitioner:
California Apartment Association, San Francisco Apartment Association and New York State Association of REALTORS, Inc.
74 Pinehurst LLC. v. State of New York
as 21-467
Defendant:
Alex Schwartz, In his official capacity as a Member of the Rent Guidelines Board, Cecilia Joza, In her official capacity as a Member of the Rent Guidelines Board, City of New York and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vasiliki Panagoulias, 141 Wadsworth LLC, Dimos Panagoulias and others
Defendant / Appellee:
New York Division of Housing and Community Renewal, RuthAnne Visnauskas, Individually and in her official capacity as Commissioner of New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, State of New York and others
Tang v. Visnauskas
as 20-62
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hong Tang
Defendant / Appellee:
Woody Pascal, Deputy Commissioner of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal and RuthAnne Visnauskas, Commissioner of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal
Syken v. State of New York
as 19-3392
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Arthur Syken
Defendant / Appellee:
New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, AKA New York State Homes and Community Renewal, State of New York and RuthAnne Visnauskas, Executive Deputy Commissioner of New York State Homes and Community Renewal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Manko v. Ruchelsman
as 12-4080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nella Manko
Defendant - Appellee:
Leon Ruchelsman, individually and in his official capacity as Justice of the New York State Supreme Court of Kings County, Kagan, individually and in his official capacity as Law Clerk of Part 16 of the Supreme Court of Kings County, Leslie Torres, individually and in her official capacity as Deputy Commissioner of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal Office of Rent Administration and others
Manko v. Ruchelsman et al
as 1:2012cv04100
Defendant:
Appellate Division of the N.Y.S. Supreme Court (Second Department), Esq. Howard M. File, Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix and others
Plaintiff:
Nella Manko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
