Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Demos v. Gannett Corp Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00914
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
Gannett Corp Inc., McClatchy Co, New York Times Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: WP Company LLC
as 15-1293
Petitioner:
NEWSPAPER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, FIRST LOOK MEDIA, INC., THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY and others
In Re: The Wall Street Journal
as 15-1179
Petitioner:
In re: THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, THE CHARLESTON GAZETTE and others
Jones v. Fox Network et al
as 1:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
Fox Network, USA Today, Washington Post and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Malkin Holdings, LLC et al
as 5:2011cv00724
Plaintiff:
Matt Robinson
Defendant:
Malkin Holdings, LLC, Beyer Blinder Belle Architects and Planners, LLC, The New York Times Company and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Julian Rochester v. State of South Carolina
as 10-6050
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, RICHLAND COUNTY JUDICIAL CENTER, JEAN H. TOAL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03148
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
David Kissi v. Pramco II, LLC
as 09-7612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. KISSI
Defendant - Appellee:
PRAMCO II, LLC, DLA PIPER, of Maryland and New York, VENABLE LLP, of Maryland and New York and others
Kissi v. Pramco II LLC et al
as 8:2009cv01934
Plaintiff:
David Kissi
Defendant:
Pramco II LLC, DLA Piper, Venable LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The News and Observer Publishi v. Raleigh-Durham Airport Authori
as 09-1654
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE NEWS AND OBSERVER PUBLISHING COMPANY, THE DURHAM HERALD COMPANY, THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
RALEIGH-DURHAM AIRPORT AUTHORITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
