Cases 1 - 7 of 7
City of Camden et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv03147
Plaintiff:
City of Camden, City of Brockton, City of Sioux Falls and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Interested Party:
State of Colorado, State of Hawaii, State of Maine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bentley v. Hoovler et al
as 1:2017cv07361
Plaintiff:
Garfield D. Bentley
Defendant:
David M. Hoovler, The City of Newburgh, The CIty of Newwburgh Municipality and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentley v. Hoovler et al
as 1:2017cv06266
Plaintiff:
Garfield D. Bentley
Defendant:
David M. Hoovler, The City of Newburgh, The City of Newburgh Municipality and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koltun v. Berry
as 17-698
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Victor Koltun
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeffrey Berry, in their individual capacity and official capacity, B. Harold Ramsey, in their individual and official capacity, Aaron Weaver, in their individual and official capacity, City of Newburgh Police and others
Defendant:
James Winslow, in their individual and official capacity
Cobbs v. The City of Newburgh
as 12-5040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robin Cobbs
Defendant:
The City of Newburgh, Jane Roe, Jeanann McGrane, Individually and in her former capacity as City Manager and others
Defendant - Appellee:
The City of Newburgh - City Counsel, The Newburgh City Police Department, Paul N. Weber, Police Officer and others
Cobbs v. The City of Newburgh et al
as 7:2009cv03800
Plaintiff:
Robin Cobbs
Defendant:
The City of Newburgh, The City of Newburgh - City Counsel, Jeanann McGrane and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
96 Broadway LLC, et al v. The City of Newburgh et al
as 7:2007cv06689
Plaintiff:
96 Broadway LLC,, Douglas R Dollinger, Michael Molus and others
Defendant:
The City of Newburgh, Nicholas Valentine, The Newburgh City Council and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
