Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ciotti v. Nexum Group, Inc.
as 6:2023cv02477
Plaintiff:
Anatres J. Ciotti
Defendant:
Nexum Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Reeves v. Reeves et al
as 1:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
Robert Wallace Reeves
Defendant:
Wallace E. Reeves, Grayhound Bus Station, Detcitive of Police Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00512
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00511
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Thompson et al v. Flintrock Feeders, LTD et al
as 2:2010mc00027
Plaintiff:
Gary Thompson and Jacob Thompson
Defendant:
Flintrock Feeders, LTD, Nexum Management, LLC, Lazy V Ranch, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Thompson et al v. Flintrock Feeders Ltd et al
as 4:2010mc00022
Plaintiff:
Gary Thompson and Jacob Thompson
Defendant:
Flintrock Feeders Ltd, Nexum Management LLC, Lazy V Ranch LLC and others
Gary Thompson, et al v. Flintrock Feeders, Limited, et al
as 10-10716
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GARY THOMPSON and JACOB THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellant:
FLINTROCK FEEDERS, LTD, NEXUM MANAGEMENT, LLC and LINDY "BUD" BOSTIC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Thompson v. Flintrock Feeders, LTD et al
as 2:2009cv00010
Plaintiff:
Gary Thompson and Jacob Thompson
Defendant:
Flintrock Feeders, LTD, Nexum Management, LLC, Lazy V Ranch, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
