Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Lor v. Kijakazi
as 0:2023cv01399
Plaintiff:
Nicholas C. Lor
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Tunick v Brown et al
as 0:2021cv00389
Defendant:
Amy E. Hood, Herbert L. Henkel, David B. Dillon and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Tunick
Blackburn v. Roman et al
as 0:2021cv00370
Defendant:
Amy E. Hood, Michael L. Eskew, David B. Dillon and others
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Blackburn
IN RE 3M COMPANY SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 0:2020cv02488
Defendant:
Inge G. Thulin, Nicholas C. Gangestad, Michael F. Roman and others
Plaintiff:
Iron Workers Local 580 Joint Funds, State of Rhode Island, Office of the Treasurer on Behalf of the Employees' Retirement System of the State of Rhode Island, Heavy & Laborers' Locals 472 & 172 Welfare Fund and others
Petitioner:
Sjunde AP-Fonden, MP Investment Management A/S and Amalgamated Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Jones v. Saul
as 0:2020cv01340
Plaintiff:
Nicholas C. Jones
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv02363
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Frederiksen v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2018cv02021
Plaintiff:
Nicholas C. Frederiksen
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stephens v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2016cv03033
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Plaintiff:
Nicholas C. Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Addison v. Harvill
as 5:2016cv00049
Plaintiff:
Nicholas C Addison
Defendant:
Carlies Harvill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hilburn v. Maples et al
as 1:2013cv00089
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Hilburn
Defendant:
John Maples, Jr, Richard L Guy, Christopher T Budnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
