Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ford et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
as 1:2023cv06057
Plaintiff:
Nichola Ford and N. F.
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv14168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Walker v. Administrator of the Estate of Former Chicago Police Department Commander Jon Burge et al
as 1:2021cv04231
Plaintiff:
Keith Walker
Defendant:
Administrator of the Estate of Former Chicago Police Department Commander Jon Burge, Daniel McWeeny, John Halloran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Jason Collura
as 19-1839
Not Yet Classified:
STEFFEN BOYD, SHONDA WILLIAMS, DARLENE MILLER and others
Santiago v. Fitzgerald Smith et al
as 1:2019cv00455
Defendant:
Nicholas Ford, Nathaniel R. Hose, Patricia Mysza and others
Plaintiff:
Fabian Santiago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2018cv00760
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Ford
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
In re: J. C.
as 18-1142
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: J. C., individually and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Respondent:
NICHOLAS FORD, STEFFEN BOYD, JOSETTE SPRINGER and others
Nominal Respondent:
C. DARNELL JONES, II
J. C. v. Nicholas Ford, et al
as 16-1718
Plaintiff - Appellant:
J. C., INDIVIDUALLY, AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED
Defendant - Appellee:
NICHOLAS FORD, STEFFEN BOYD, JOSETTE SPRINGER and others
Timothy Reliford v. Lisa Madigan, et al
as 15-3816
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY RELIFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
LISA MADIGAN, THOMAS J. DART, NICHOLAS FORD and others
Timothy Reliford v. Lisa Madigan, et al
as 15-3752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY RELIFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
LISA MADIGAN, THOMAS J. DART, NICHOLAS FORD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
