Cases 41 - 50 of 150
Jason Collura v. Nicholas Ford, et al
as 21-1089
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT J. MALVESUTO, JOHN W. HARRISON, DARLENE MILLER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON COLLURA
Albrecht v. Davis
as 3:2021cv00048
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Albrecht
Defendant:
Kelly Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Cox
as 4:2020cv04199
Respondent:
J.W. Cox
Petitioner:
Nicholas James Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nicholas Willing v. USDC-NVL
as 20-73257
Not Classified By Court:
ADAM LAXALT, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA, BRIAN WILLIAMS, Sr. and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS JAMES WILLING
VETROVEC v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv03634
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS JAMES VETROVEC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LIETEAU v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv92960
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS JAMES LIETEAU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARNOLD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv84611
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS JAMES ARNOLD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHAPMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv64546
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS JAMES CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BLAKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv58651
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS JAMES BLAKE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUDNICK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv44882
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS JAMES BUDNICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
